Page 781 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 781

Please confirm in writing your specific instructions with regards to the email below and
               confirm your authorisation for me to send it, in addition to any amendments that you wish me
               to consider including. I need a response to this before 3pm today, 2nd March 2016 please.
               Regards
               Josephine
               Dear Sir or Madam
               We refer to the hearsay application dated 23rd February 2016, received in the DX at our
               office 1st March 2016.
               We require all witnesses to attend as listed on page 5 - 66 to be cross examined.
               We confirm that we object to the Respondent's application to adduce hearsay evidence
               contained in the CRIMINT reports pages 79 - 92, 109 - 121 of the Respondent bundles.
               CRIMINT - YERT00376728 - Aaron King is required to attend to be cross examined
               CRIMINT -YERT00376227 - PC Chandler is required to attend to be cross examined
               CRIMINT - YERT00376229 - PC Edgoose is required to attend to be cross examined. The
               Appellant also specifically requests disclosure of police checks made on the vehicle he was
               driving and the vehicle he was alleged to have been driving bumper to bumper to. The
               564,
               Appellant also requests specific confirmation in a statement from PC Edgoose the following:
               (a) why he was not arrested for any offences in relation to his driving as PC Edgoose makes
               specific reference to the driver he was following confirming that the Appellant had been
               driving in the same manner from YR. (b) Summons for any road traffic violations (c) CADS /
               communications concerning name checks CRIMINT -YERT00376024 - PS Skinner is
               required to attend to be cross examined. The Appellant seeks specific disclosure as to the
               vehicle checks carried out on PE52 UHW. Whether Simon Cordell was ever stopped in this
               vehicle in the past? Whether Simon Cordell was ever stopped in company with Elliot Laidler
               in the past? Why was the music system not seized? Full names of all other persons inside the
               premises to confirm the number of people present. Results of the search of the premises, in
               addition to the keys found at the premises. Whether any other persons were arrested, if so
               what for? Disclosure of CADS / statements / complaints regarding anti-social behaviour?
               Whether any allegations of criminal damage / commercial burglary were made? What
               enquiries were made from the owners of the building as to the premises being occupied?
               CRIS 1914855/14 - Statements from officers who attended the premises, confirming from
               whom the sound system was seized? Whether Simon Cordell was present at the event? Why
               was the sound system restored?
               CRIMINT - YERT00374531 - PC Shinnick is required to attend to be cross examined. CAD's
               re 6th, 7th and 8th June 2014 Progress Way.
               The Appellant seeks full disclosure of all CADs linked to this CAD. The Intelligence report
               suggests that Simon Cordell and Tyrone Benjamin set up and organised this rave. The
               Appellant requests a full detailed statement report as to the basis of this comment. The
               Appellant disputes ever being inside Progress Way premises on 7th June 2014. The Appellant
               disputes supplying equipment at this location. The Appellant disputes that he set up or
               organised this event. The Appellant seeks disclosure of all intelligence, names etc of persons
               present at this event. The Appellant specifically requests disclosure of all CADs from 6th
               June 2014 onwards in correct chronological, timed and dated order. The Appellant also seeks
               confirmation as to whether the complaints made with regards to antisocial behaviour were
               made in respect of Progress Way or Crown Road, the premises of which was subject to
               numerous complaints in the past by local residents etc. The Appellant also seeks specifically
               disclosure from the Public Order Unit whether they were provided with the names of other
               persons present, vehicles etc and whether the named persons have been known in the past for
               organising similar events.
   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786