Page 785 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

ASBO against his name will significantly tarnish his ability to conduct legitimate business.
The Appellant also takes issue with the misleading press releases in relation to the original
imposition of the ASBO in the Magistrates Court. The Appellant will state that the District
Judge in delivering her judgement could not find any form of illegality, or that the events
alleged were in fact "raves" as defined by the legislation. The Metropolitan police published
this in local media to tarnish his reputation.

51.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
51. 1. 2
Asbo Simon Cordell vs. for mention 02-03-2016 10-11
02/03/2016
/ Page Numbers: 568,569
--
568,
From: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com>
Sent time: 02/03/2016 10:11:01 AM
To: re_wired@ymail.com;
Andrew.Morris@legalaid.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: Simon Cordell v. The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis for mention on 4th
April 2016 at Wood Green Crown Court
Simon
Can you please review the initial response to the Respondent's application to adduce the
hearsay evidence. I have included some of the points that you take issue with. A full skeleton
legal argument will be served addressing all points you wish raised following our meeting on
Friday morning at 11am subject to you confirming that you can attend. I need a response to
the email which I am proposing on sending over to the court so that our objection to the
hearsay evidence is noted.
Please confirm in writing your specific instructions with regards to the email below and
confirm your authorisation for me to send it, in addition to any amendments that you wish me
to consider including. I need a response to this before 3pm today, 2nd March 2016 please.
Regards
Josephine
Dear Sir or Madam
We refer to the hearsay application dated 23rd February 2016, received in the DX at our
office 1st March 2016.
We require all witnesses to attend as listed on page 5 - 66 to be cross examined.
We confirm that we object to the Respondent's application to adduce hearsay evidence
contained in the CRIMINT reports pages 79 - 92, 109 - 121 of the Respondent bundles.
CRIMINT - YERT00376728 - Aaron King is required to attend to be cross examined
CRIMINT -YERT00376227 - PC Chandler is required to attend to be cross examined
CRIMINT - YERT00376229 - PC Edgoose is required to attend to be cross examined. The
Appellant also specifically requests disclosure of police checks made on the vehicle he was
driving and the vehicle he was alleged to have been driving bumper to bumper to. The
Appellant also requests specific confirmation in a statement from PC Edgoose the following:
(a) why he was not arrested for any offences in relation to his driving as PC Edgoose makes
specific reference to the driver he was following confirming that the Appellant had been
driving in the same manner from YR. (b) Summons for any road traffic violations (c) CADS /
communications concerning name checks