Page 783 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Josephine
On 02 March 2016 at 13:49 Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com> wrote:
Thank you for taking your time to do this, however I do have a question to ask, in the
beginning of the court case leading up to the trial, I believed that the justice system would
prove my innocents, but due to the District Judge finding me guilty under the applicants case
of organising illegal raves, that is said to have caused alarm harm or distress to one or more
over house hold, To which the barrister representing me at the time, having that of the same
opinion about the law as myself, “that it should not be illegal if there is no law or regulations
to make it illegal or none that have been breached.”
I was not an organiser as trespass was not present neither have, I broke any conditions in the
licensing act 2003. After the trial, I went home and applied for the appeal stage as I knew that
this was wrong, this also made me look into the case even further to notice the time stamps
and so many over errors, My question to you is, “now that the errors have been pointed out,
how can we ask the police for more information such as the missing cads and hope that they
do not fabricate more evidence making it so condemning that I would never stand a fair trial
under article six.
(I am scared to ask for more evidence that should prove my innocents, as I believe the police
will make it up, as we can prove happened all ready.)
Please can you explain this to me, before I agree for you to send any think?
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016, 10:11, Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com>
wrote:
Simon
Can you please review the initial response to the Respondent's application to adduce the
hearsay evidence. I have included some of the points that you take issue with. A full skeleton
legal argument will be served addressing all points you wish raised following our meeting on
Friday morning at 11am subject to you confirming that you can attend. I need a response to
the email which I am proposing on sending over to the court so that our objection to the
hearsay evidence is noted.
Please confirm in writing your specific instructions with regards to the email below and
confirm your authorisation for me to send it, in addition to any amendments that you wish me
to consider including. I need a response to this before 3pm today, 2nd March 2016 please.
Regards
Josephine
Dear Sir or Madam
We refer to the hearsay application dated 23rd February 2016, received in the DX at our
office 1st March 2016.
We require all witnesses to attend as listed on page 5 - 66 to be cross examined.
We confirm that we object to the Respondent's application to adduce hearsay evidence
contained in the CRIMINT reports pages 79 - 92, 109 - 121 of the
566,
Respondent bundles.
CRIMINT - YERT00376728 - Aaron King is required to attend to be cross examined
CRIMINT -YERT00376227 - PC Chandler is required to attend to be cross examined
CRIMINT - YERT00376229 - PC Edgoose is required to attend to be cross examined. The
Appellant also specifically requests disclosure of police checks made on the vehicle he was
driving and the vehicle he was alleged to have been driving bumper to bumper to. The
Appellant also requests specific confirmation in a statement from PC Edgoose the following:
(a) why he was not arrested for any offences in relation to his driving as PC Edgoose makes
specific reference to the driver he was following confirming that the Appellant had been