Page 807 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

- I ask you for your guidance in the question of “How can I get the blame for being the
company named ever decibel matters, when I have provided a company head letter with the
company number listed at company house, off the director that I have managed to acquire due
to the ongoing Asbo application? To which explains that I was not involved in the date in
question also that being of the court transcripts stating of office Pc Elsmore that he has done
no further investigation in to the allegations he has accused myself off on the dates relating to
mill marsh lane in reference to every decibel matters?
- Please can you reply to this question, How can I stand a fair trial in 2016 with my up
and coming appeal date, with the evidence the applicant rests it case on being of backward
time stamps relating to the incident numbers and previous correspondents.? To which I would
like you to confirm is more than likely to be in error form the list of correspondents I have
provided you with so far relating to the management of national standards for incident
recording NSIR and collection and recording of police procedure (Command and Control)
and Emergency services command and control?
- I ask you my acting solicitor the question of “Why has the applicant not removed
cases that when the Asbo application was in development was clearly added incorrectly due
to the other whelming fact that I Mr Simon Cordell clearly could have not committed such
th
th
offence as dated the 19 August 2013, which does in fact relate to cad 10635 19 July 2014
page 294 to which a member of the public made a emergency 999 call in relation to “all white
males and females entering a premises, to which the cad continues to explain that members of
the met police attended the location to contain the people who were in fact occupiers of the
Land within their home, also listing all name and vehicles of the occupiers contained in the
building to which I am none of the listed?
- My next question I require you to help give your legal guidance in is “What was the
need for the applicant to updated their incident reports also named as (information Reports) at
such a later date(s) after the information had already been created after the event date, in turn
creating such lengthy time periods between the initial event date contained within the
national police computer to the entry of the police statements intelligence, Is that incorrect in
police procedure?
- I ask you to take reference to all blocked out ATT, locations that are relating to other
th
house parties that was within a two minute distance from the location in question On the 6
th
th
7 8 June 2014, otherwise known and named as the old man building adjourned to Crown
Road, to which officer Pc Elsmore states at trial under oath that he was sure that there was no
other house party's on the same date that are contained within the applicants bundle and that
th
all incident that are contained relate to (progress way on the 7 June 2014)
The officer's statement can be checked by the transcripts of the day of my trial that has been
provided to yourself of him clearly stating to the district Jude to obtain a guilty plea against
my self-inaccuracies when being questioned by the representing barrister in relation to the
statement that I just quoted. Please can you confirm that I am correct in stating this?
- Can you also reply to the question of why the applicant has not reduced the evidence
that it submitted in the first bundle that is of the
580,
issue relating to blocked out locations of cads otherwise known as incident numbers that I
have been accused of that members of the Met police have in development of the application
inputted and submitted incorrectly that do in fact relate to wide spread geological location off
the incidents that occurred on the same date of the incident I am being wrongfully accused of
and that being of the developers of the application blocking out the ATT, locations and not
blocking out the grid reference numbers making it possible to prove my innocents gratefully,
also errors like land marks such as A&J cars which is a cab station across the road from
crown road not the private house party that I am being questioned for. I would not have been