Page 808 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

able to prove the truth. My question to you in regard to this issue can I stand a fair trial with
the applicant not addressing the issues as we highlighted and raise them?
- The definition of the legal term of (Raves) defines outdoor (in open space) to which
none of the applicant’s cases are in fact outdoors (in open space). As defined by section 63
what does also state that trespass must be present inside a premise of residence to which I
have never been accused off. I ask you is this correct in law.
- I ask you to reply to the question of is it true to believe in accordance of the united
kingdom laws and regulations that house party(s) that are in a places of residence are not
illegal to hold, when holding such private events in accordance of the licensing act 2003 to
which states in such incidents unless proof of profit has being made when providing
entertainment it shall not be regulated under the licensing act 2003 to which the applicant
does not mention money?
- In reference to the ADR bill relating to the carriage of dangerous goods, is it against
the law to carry nitro's oxide or any co2 gas when having the correct signage on the vehicle
transporting the cylinders?
- I ask is it against the law for an Asbo application to made when there is a conflict of
work under the crime and disorder act 1998, in such incidents were the defendant has been
working for the Local council authority who the police have asked to be in support of the
application?
- Has Adrian coombs contacted you or do you have a date in mind that you will have
the notes that I have asked of you to request of him?
• my questions are that of their being so many inconsistencies contained within the police
statements, by recognising so may
irregularities that I know I have not had the right to challenge I feel the need to defend myself
against such illegal statements made by police officers the same as I would if made by a
member of the public for allegations such as (organising illegal raves) So this brought me to
the basics of law civil and criminal, I learnt and believe in the understanding of criminal
cases were some think is alleged to be illegal the correct Police procedure is that a crime will
be created under the crime and disorder act 1998 by way of a victim or witness making a
report then members of the police will be allocated to the incident and start investigations
depending on the matter of relevance to the initial report to the resources available at the
time. The investigations may lead to an arrest what will lead the detainee to his or her
statuary legal rights. In the early 1980's the police did have the power to take cases to court
without the decision of without the decision of any other governing body, but now in 2016
the burden relays solely on the cps who are in calibration with Revenue and Customs
Prosecution Office and is headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) who is
independent but subject to the superintendence of the Attorney General that is accountable to
members of Parliament that do work for the prosecution services. If charged any person’s
rights are gained under section 24 and 25 which does relate to the rights of any person
charged and the minimum standards of criminal procedure. But my case seems to sit in its
civil capacity at court with none of the above regulations and my rights being carried out in
accordance of the United Kingdom laws; please can you explain this to me?
Thank you, Josephine Simon.

The banging Started!
Flat – 113 – Empty!
Stain Curtis (responsible)
Mathiyalagan (Responsible)