Page 803 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 803

Prosecutions (DPP) who is independent but subject to the superintendence of the Attorney
               General that is accountable to members of Parliament that do work for the prosecution
               services. If charged any person’s rights are gained under section 24 and 25 which does relate
               to the rights of any person charged and the minimum standards of criminal procedure. But my
               case seems to sit in its civil capacity at court with none of the above regulations and my rights
               being carried out in accordance of the United Kingdom laws; please can you explain this to
               me?
               Thank you, Josephine Simon.


               57.
               Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
               57. 1. 2
               Asbo Me to Josie -08-03-2016 15-51
               08/03/2016
               / Page Numbers: 577,578
               --
               577,
               From: Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com>
               Sent time: 08/03/2016 03:51:23 PM
               To: JOSEPHINE WARD <josephmewardsolicitor@gmail.com>
               Subject: Re: Please reply
               If you will not reply to my questions, I will be forced to go to the legal omblishman and legal
               aid department as well as seek legal advice in the public domain to weather, you should or
               not.
               I have asked you the same questions over and over again and you steer away from them
               making me feel as if you are holding me hostage to laws that you no should never be imposed
               upon myself as I clearly keep pointing out the points of law and the barrister clearly agrees
               with me in the submissions as does anyone else I ask for their legal opinion please can you
               reply back to my questions in the emails I have sent about my case before we go any further I
               have been locked in my house for two years telling you the same think asking the same
               questions and still am not any of the wiser.
               On Tuesday, 8 March 2016, 15:40, Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com> wrote:
               I would like you to deal with the issues I have raised before we go any further as I feel it is un
               fair for you not to address them as they are to do with my case and I have asked the same
               questions to yourself time and time again will you do this for me p[lease in a headed
               company letter. please reply.
               On Tuesday, 8 March 2016, 14:23, JOSEPHINE WARD
               <josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com> wrote:
               Simon
               Please confirm you can attend my office this Thursday at 6pm so that I can deal with the
               relevant aspects of your appeal and the questions raised by HHJ Pawlak.
               Many thanks Josephine
               On 8 Mar 2016 11:48, "Rewired " <re wired@ymail.com> wrote:
               I have a few questions I have to ask off you that have built up and I know that I have been
               asking since the start of my court case, that I do feel have not been addressed correctly? So
               please can you answer each question individually and bulletined in the same format, so I can
               understand my case, with your legal guidance.
               -       Why have I not ever been arrested, for some think that clearly states that it is illegal?
   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808