Page 799 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

national police computer to the entry of the police statements intelligence, Is that incorrect in
police procedure?
- I ask you to take reference to all blocked out att locations that are relating to other
th
house parties that was within a two minute distance from the location in question On the 6
th
th
7 8 June 2014, otherwise known and named as the old man building adjourned to Crown
Road, to which officer Pc Elsmore states at trial under oath that he was sure that there was no
other house party's on the same date that are contained within the applicants bundle and that
all incident that are contained relate to (progress way on the 7 June 2014) The officer's
th
statement can be checked by the transcripts of the day of my trial that has been provided to
yourself of him clearly stating to the district Jude to obtain a guilty plea against my self-
inaccuracies when being questioned by the representing barrister in relation to the statement
that I just quoted. Please can you confirm that I am correct in stating this?
- Can you also reply to the question of why has the applicant not reduced the evidence
that it submitted in the first bundle that is of the issue relating to blocked out locations of cads
otherwise known as incident numbers that I have been accused of that members of the Met
police have in development of the application inputted and submitted incorrectly that do in
fact relate to wide spread geological location off the incidents that occurred on the same date
of the incident I am being wrongfully accused of and that being of the developers of the
application blocking out the att locations and not blocking out the grid reference numbers
making it possible to prove my innocents gratefully, also errors like land marks such as A&J
cars which is a cab station across the road from crown road not the private house party that I
am being questioned for. I would not have been able to prove the truth. My question to you in
regard to this issue can I stand a fair trial with the applicant not addressing the issues as we
highlighted and raise them?
- The definition of the legal term of (Raves) defines outdoor (in open space) to which
none of the applicant’s cases are in fact outdoors (in open space). As defined by section 63
what does also state that trespass must be present inside a premise of residence to which I
have never been accused off. I ask you is this correct in law.
574,
- I ask you to reply to the question of is it true to believe in accordance of the united
kingdom laws and regulations that house party(s) that are in a places of residence are not
illegal to hold, when holding such private events in accordance of the licensing act 2003 to
which states in such incidents unless proof of profit has being made when providing
entertainment it shall not be regulated under the licensing act 2003 to which the applicant
does not mention money?
- In reference to the ADR bill relating to the carriage of dangerous goods, is it against
the law to carry nitro's oxide or any co2 gas when having the correct signage on the vehicle
transporting the cylinders?
- I ask is it against the law for an Asbo application to made when there is a conflict of
work under the crime and disorder act 1998, in such incidents were the defendant has been
working for the Local council authority who the police have asked to be in support of the
application?
- Has Adrian coombs contacted you or do you have a date in mind that you will have
the notes that I have asked of you to request of him?
- my questions is that of their being so many inconsistencies contained within the
police statements, by recognising so may irregularities that I know I have not had the right to
challenge I feel the need to defend myself against such illegal statements made by police
officers the same as I would if made by a member of the public for allegations such as
(organising illegal raves) So this brought me to the basics of law civil and criminal, I learnt
and believe in the understanding of criminal cases were some think is alleged to be illegal the