Page 801 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 801

-       Why did the distract Jude in the magistrates court say to me which can be checked in
               the court transcripts which has been provided to you that private air and open air are the same
               in turn stating that it is illegal to listen to music without licensing to which myself and
               barrister clearly state otherwise? And am I Wong in believing that the district Jude was
               wrong in stating this to be a true fact of law?
               -       I ask you my solicitor Josephine ward to check my PNC recorded provided within the
               applicants bundle to see that off me not having any similar convictions under the criminal
               justice act 1998 before the incident(s) dates that I am being accused of relating to the
               organisation of illegal raves and to confirm this in a company headed letter with the rest of
               the answers regarding your guidance in the points of law to each specific questions contained
               within this letter addressed to yourself who is my acting solicitor representing me in the
               ongoing of the applicants case towards an ASBO application? I ask of you to do this before
               our next needed meeting that has been agreed.
               -       I ask you for your guidance in the question of “How can I get the blame for being the
               company named ever decibel matters, when I have provided a company head letter with the
               company number listed at company house, off the director that I have managed to acquire due
               to the ongoing Asbo application? To which explains that I was not involved in the date in
               question also that being of the court transcripts stating of office Pc Elsmore that he has done
               no further investigation in to the allegations he has accused myself off on the dates relating to
               mill marsh lane in reference to every decibel matters?
               -       Please can you reply to this question, How can I stand a fair trial in 2016 with my up
               and coming appeal date, with the evidence the applicant rests it case on being of backward
               time stamps relating to the incident numbers and previous correspondents.? To which I would
               like you to confirm is more than likely to be in error form the list of correspondents I have
               provided you with so far relating to the management of national standards for incident
               recording NSIR and collection and recording of police procedure (Command and Control)
               and Emergency services command and control?
               -       I ask you my acting solicitor the question of “Why has the applicant not removed
               cases that when the Asbo application was in development was clearly added incorrectly due
               to the other whelming fact that I Mr Simon Cordell clearly could have not committed such
                                     th
                                                                                            th
               offence as dated the 19  August 2013, which does in fact relate to cad 10635 19  July 2014
               page 294 to which a member of the public made an emergency 999 call in relation to “all
               white males and females entering a premises, to which the cad continues to explain that
               members of the met police attended the location to contain the people who were in fact
               occupiers of the Land within their home, also listing all name and vehicles of the occupiers
               contained in the building to which I am none of the listed?
               -       My next question I require you to help give your legal guidance in is “What was the
               need for the applicant to updated their incident reports also named as (information Reports) at
               such a later date(s) after the information had already been created after the event date, in turn
               creating such lengthy time periods between the initial event date contained within the
               national police computer to the entry of the police statements intelligence, Is that incorrect in
               police procedure?
               -       I ask you to take reference to all blocked out ATT, locations that are relating to other
                                                                                                      th
               house parties that was within a two minute distance from the location in question On the 6
                 th
                    th
               7  8  June 2014, otherwise known and named as the old man building adjourned to Crown
               Road, to which officer Pc Elsmore states at trial under oath that he was sure that there was no
               other house party's on the same date that are contained within the applicants bundle and that
               all incident that are contained relate
               576,
   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806