Page 805 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

house party's on the same date that are contained within the applicants bundle and that all
th
incident that are contained relate to (progress way on the 7 June 2014) The officer's
statement can be checked by the transcripts of the day of my trial that has been provided to
yourself of him clearly stating to the district Jude to obtain a guilty plea against my self-
inaccuracies when being questioned by the representing barrister in relation to the statement
that I just quoted. Please can you confirm that I am correct in stating this?
• Can you also reply to the question of why has the applicant not reduced the evidence that it
submitted in the first bundle that is of the issue relating to blocked out locations of cads
otherwise known as incident numbers that I have been accused of that members of the Met
police have in development of the application inputted and submitted incorrectly that do in
fact relate to wide spread geological location off the incidents that occurred on the same date
of the incident I am being wrongfully accused of and that being of the developers of the
application blocking out the ATT, locations and not blocking out the grid reference numbers
making it possible to prove my innocents gratefully, also errors like land marks such as A&J
cars which is a cab station across the road from crown road not the private house party that I
am being questioned for. I would not have been able to prove the truth. My question to you in
regard to this issue can I stand a fair trial with the applicant not addressing the issues as we
highlighted and raise them?
• The definition of the legal term of (Raves) defines outdoor (in open space) to which none of
the applicant’s cases are in fact outdoors (in open space). As defined by section 63 what does
also state that trespass must be present inside a premise of residence to which I have never
been accused off. I ask you is this correct in law.
• I ask you to reply to the question of is it true to believe in accordance of the united kingdom
laws and regulations that house party(s) that are in a places of residence are not illegal to
hold, when holding such private events in accordance of the licensing act 2003 to which
states in such incidents unless proof of profit has being made when providing entertainment it
shall not be regulated under the licensing act 2003 to which the applicant does not mention
money?
• In reference to the ADR bill relating to the carriage of dangerous goods, is it against the law
to carry nitro's oxide or any co2 gas when having the correct signage on the vehicle
transporting the cylinders?
• I ask is it against the law for an Asbo application to made when there is a conflict of work
under the crime and disorder act 1998, in such incidents were the defendant has been working
for the Local council authority who the police have asked to be in support of the application?
• Has Adrian coombs contacted you or do you have a date in mind that you will have the
notes that I have asked of you to request of him?
• my questions is that of their being so many inconsistencies contained within the police
statements, by recognising so may irregularities that I know I have not had the right to
challenge I feel the need to defend myself against such illegal statements made by police
officers the same as I would if made by a member of the public for allegations such as
(organising illegal raves) So this brought me to the basics of law civil and criminal, I learnt
and believe in the understanding of criminal cases were some think is alleged to be illegal the
correct Police procedure is that a crime will be created under the crime and disorder act 1998
by way of a victim or witness making a report then members of the police will be allocated to
the incident and start investigations depending on the matter of relevance to the initial report
to the resources available at the time. The investigations may lead to an arrest what will lead
the detainee to his or her statuary legal rights. In the early 1980's the police did have the
power to take cases to court without the decision of without the decision of any other
governing body, but now in 2016 the burden relays solely on the cps who are in calibration
with Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office and is headed by the Director of Public