Page 798 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 798

To: Josephine Ward <josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com>
               Subject: Please reply
               I have a few questions I have to ask off you that have built up and I know that I have been
               asking since the start of my court case, that I do feel have not been addressed correctly? So
               please can you answer each question individually and bulletined in the same format, so I can
               understand my case, with your legal guidance.
               -       Why have I not ever been arrested, for some think that clearly states that it is illegal?
               -       Is it wrong for my Asbo case to be sitting in its civil capacity at court when it states in
               the applicant’s case I am being accused of the organisation of illegal raves with no previous
               convictions?
               -       Why did the distract Jude in the magistrates court say to me which can be checked in
               the court transcripts which has been provided to you that private air and open air are the same
               in turn stating that it is illegal to listen to music without licensing to which myself and
               barrister clearly state otherwise? And am I Wong in believing that the district Jude was
               wrong in stating this to be a true fact of law?
               -       I ask you my solicitor Josephine ward to check my pnc recorded provided within the
               applicants bundle to see that off me not having any similar convictions under the criminal
               justice act 1998 before the incident(s) dates that I am being accused of relating to the
               organisation of illegal raves and to confirm this in a company headed letter with the rest of
               the answers regarding your guidance in the points of law to each specific questions contained
               within this letter addressed to yourself who is my acting solicitor representing me in the
               ongoing of the applicants case towards an ASBO application? I ask of you to do this before
               our next needed meeting that has been agreed.
               -       I ask you for your guidance in the question of “How can I get the blame for being the
               company named ever decibel matters, when I have provided a company head letter with the
               company number listed at company house, off the director that I have managed to acquire due
               to the ongoing Asbo application? To which explains that I was not involved in the date in
               question also that being of the court transcripts stating of office Pc Elsmore that he has done
               no further investigation in to the allegations he has accused myself off on the dates relating to
               mill marsh lane in reference to every decibel matters?
               -       Please can you reply to this question, How can I stand a fair trial in 2016 with my up
               and coming appeal date, with the evidence the applicant rests it case on being of backward
               time stamps relating to the incident numbers and previous correspondents.? To which I would
               like you to confirm is more than likely to be in error form the list of correspondents I have
               provided you with so far relating to the management of national standards for incident
               recording NSIR and collection and recording of police procedure (Command and Control)
               and Emergency services command and control?
               -       I ask you my acting solicitor the question of “Why has the applicant not removed
               cases that when the Asbo application was in development was clearly added incorrectly due
               to the other whelming fact that I Mr Simon Cordell clearly could have not committed such
                                                                                            th
                                     th
               offence as dated the 19  August 2013, which does in fact relate to cad 10635 19  July 2014
               page 294 to which a member of the public made a emergency 999 call in relation to “all white
               males and females entering a premises, to which the cad continues to explain that members of
               the met police attended the location to contain the people who were in fact occupiers of the
               Land within their home, also listing all name and vehicles of the occupiers contained in the
               building to which I am none of the listed?
               -       My next question I require you to help give your legal guidance in is “What was the
               need for the applicant to updated their incident reports also named as (information Reports) at
               such a later date(s) after the information had already been created after the event date, in turn
               creating such lengthy time periods between the initial event date contained within the
   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803